Floors and Flexibility Information and Business Processing

Question: Discuss about the Floors and Flexibility for Information and Business Processing. Answer: Introduction The computer programming and the programming languages do not have to be lengthy and there is a need for analysing the in depth information with the contact with the other computing device. This is based on having a grasp to the different environment and the ways of the formal, pre-defined and the pre-formatted structure to tell the computer about the functioning of the same. The creation of the programming language is based on holding the tedious and the other lengthy processes which will help in analysing about the increasing interests of the people to create a proper and the domain specific language. (Hill et al., 2015). This language will be helpful and important for the different people who are able to handle the highly levelled languages in the applications. The automation process is based on the tasks and the design of the tasks for the programming languages. These are based on the creation of the needs as well as how they have to be solved. There have been different types of the programming languages which come in the different parameters. But we need to consider the static and the dynamic languages which are based on sorting the in-depth analysis along with simplification of the things, with different assumptions. We need to focus on the programs which are in static form and are compiled with the machine code, where the program has been in the dynamic language with the interpreter. The testing of the languages is based on the static languages which consists of the variables and the other procedures that have been defined in the different processes. To access the values, the parameters have not been relevant where there is a need to set a scope for the syntax error issues in the time compiled. (Howland et al., 2015). The report has been based on describing the language which pertains to the specific domains for the multimedia. This a considered to be the broader domain and so the scope of the language is considered to be completely narrowed down with the manipulation of the graphs and the other kinds of the representation tools. The information for the different graphs has been representative that has a huge benefit for working on the improvement of the tools with the understanding of the semantics which will be behind the information. As per the analysis, the relationship has been set to handle the information representation proper development of the programming language and the complete range of the applications. The concepts have been declared with the different manipulation possibilities and the utilisation process that helps in the expansion of the usage of the representation in the graphical format. Interpretation Compilation Method There have been distinct methods which are based on the interpretation and the compilation that has not been defined in a proper manner. The setup is mainly for handling the employing of the method which are not completely exclusive mutually. Hence, it is important for the appropriate interpretation as well as the compilation of the measures on the different spectrums which will help in handling the languages which lie under the range of the language patterns on the compile language spectrum. There have been approaches which works on the advantages and the disadvantages of the system. (Tan et al., 2016). For SemHive, there is a need for the proper development of the intricacies which are independent of the platform they are working on. The users need to make sure of the different information process along with handling the development of the representation in the graphical form. This will help in setting the proper and the immediate feedback to the changes. It is possible to work on the applications which works on the different knowledge representation and involve the group of the users. These are based on the common project with the important portability. The facts are based on the interpretation with the approach to handle the execution of the program which will be seen to be favourable. The conventional pattern is for the interpretation that is based on the security and the malicious attacks and the bugs. It is important to note that the applications of the SemHive has not been for the issues. Hence, with this, there is a need to work on the criticism which will be slower than the compilation process where the true impact has been based on the applications which involve the operations and the automation. (Feo, 2016). In likelihood, the programs are based on the development which will be used for the different purposes. Memory Management Scoping Features The memory management is based on handling the finite resources with the focus on handling the needs of the memory patterns. This is to store the different types of the data along with the other run-time routines. The program has been able to handle the different applications with the focus on the execution of the features like the threading and the multiprocessing. The memory management is based on the automatic and the manual process which is able to handle a complete control over the computer systems with the increased complexity of the factors to write the program which is completely free of bugs. As per the allocation process, the programs have been able to set the memory which delivers the specific releasing process along with handling the employing of the garbage collection features with the resolving of the chinks of the memory. The scope for this is mainly based on handling the automatic memory management which employs to take hold of the unallocated memory pools. The patterns are depending on the scope of the variables which depends on the handling of the identifier who becomes free to the different associated variables. There have been features which are able to allow the identifiers with the reusage of the program and the prevention from the different clashes in the variables. For this, there is a need to work on determining the different identifiers with the dynamic scoping of the variables with the point of the time in the execution. The lexical scoping is considered to be using the dynamic procedures along with the more intuitive approaches. (Ball et al., 2015). The focus has been mainly on handling the representation process with the manual management that leads to the complication of the management and the programming process. This is mainly for handling the garbage collection technique which is for the SemHive. The Dynamic scoping is based on the less intuitive patterns which are than the lexical scoping for the people who have a limitation to the background in the flow of control of the programs. Major Language Features Simplicity This is mainly for handling the programming languages which is difficult for the defining procedure. For this, there has been a characterisation process in different factors with the major focus on how to handle the people who are occulted to the relevant manner. There are some programmers who find it easier to define the units with the performance based on the well-defined tasks that are completely modular. The pattern for the SemHive has been to describe about the complexity along with the use of the information that have been based on the minimum amount of the patterns. Orthogonality This is based on the independence of the variables which are for the different setup of the elements. For this, the language of the programming is set to construct and take hold of the different elementary and the derived procedures for the function. They are mainly related to the patterns which do not affect each other. The design is mainly set for the components where the changes in the system can be easily handled and executed through the use of the components. (Wu, 2015). The importance for this is for the orthogonality which is mainly based on the different components like the programming structures and the other data types. The construction process for the SemHive is important for handling and avoiding the ambiguity of the process with the clear presentation of the data with the input and the outputs. This will be able to provide a better modular approach with the orthogonal structure development. The SemHive has been based on the object oriented procedures and not mainly the s tructural one. Data Types The availability of the different data types is based on handling the programming language. It is based on the different forms like the C and C++ which is able to set a standard template for the different elements. The data carries the different limitations along with the process for the appropriate usage. Another major concept has been based on the programming that holds the typecasting with the use of the unexpected varying problems. The languages have been set to handle the Python language which not mainly emphasise on the data type of the users. In this way, it is able to help the programmers to work on the different types of the concepts along with the management to the singular types of the data at a particular location. This is handled effectively through the backend procedures. There has been data which is able to carry the information and needs to handle the relevant information with the approach that the Python is able to work on the different processes that are simple for the programming and development purpose. The carrying of the risks and the other factors leads to the loss of the information in semantics which is not for the SemHive. Hence, it is important to focus on the data with a broader spectrum that is strongly typed where the variables are able to handle the use and the other associated types of the data. Syntax Design This is based on how the programming language is able to determine the syntax tree. This is based on determining the elements with the proper execution and the implementation processes. The Syntax tree is able to work on the code evaluation process along with handling the points of the code which are important for the Symantec correction and the execution process. This is able to handle and determine the different elements for the purpose of interaction. The example for this are the languages like LISP which are able to employ the system for the S-Expressions through the ordering of the tuples of the elements with the state of the root and the children. (Janjic et al., 2016). The XML and JSON makes the use of the information with the structural development that has been for the proper setup of the procedure along with the data structures. The patters for Python is based on the readability and the syntactical grouping where there have been different languages which can be used as the delimiters for the end keyword. This has been set for the reversed structural names and the other news lines structure. Support for Abstraction Through the process of the abstraction which refers to the hiding of the underlying of the conceptual features with the particular actions with better performance and the patterns. This will help in focusing on utilising the patterns with the performance of the different functions and the features. The controlled abstraction involves the use of the programs which are mainly for handling the program in a broader functional manner mainly without the process to expose to the different steps that have been involved to it. The higher level for the controlled abstraction is based on the allowing of the different activities to work on focusing of how the bits are manipulated. The setup of the python enables a higher degree of the data abstraction along with this the user does not have to declare the different types of the data. This is for the different structures where the arrays can be able to effectively handle and work on the in-built structural programming. The usage of the arrays can be important for the process of the data abstraction. SemHive has been able to work on the domain specific language where there is a possibility to employ a higher level of the abstraction process with the control of the data. Expressivity This is based on the power to handle the meanings and the different contexts which are focusing on the handling of programming languages. The pattern has been defined to focus on the language to express the solutions to the problem. It has the intent to work on the writing of the computer program where there is a need to work on the original solution of the problem as well as handling the concise and the intuitive manner for the solving of the problems. With this, there has been no particular pattern which leads to no formalised definition. (Ball et al., 2015). Hence, the open discussion and the expressivity will help in attempting to compare the languages along with being expressive depending upon the logic that has been provided. The setup for this has been where the language is able to work on the different decades with the improvement of the attributes to the adoption of the language like the encapsulation, inheritance and the process of abstraction. This has now been in the most different languages where SemHive has been for the accomplishments based on the goals along with the incorporation of the different concepts to achieve a higher target to the expressivity. Type Checking With this, there has been a process to verify and validate the rules which are able to handle the constraints which are enforced on the different static and the dynamic procedures. The static is mainly to express the relatively of the type checking manners along with the compilation of the run time of the system. For this, there has been no specific rule that has been set. Only a single pattern is defined for the implementation of the language and the type checking. There have been programs which are for the evaluation of the static process with the type check which evaluates on the declaration of the different types of the data at the run time. The trade-off procedures are mainly to handle the static and the dynamic checking which concerns to the execution speed where the static is to allow the code creation which has been executed more quickly than the dynamic check. The dynamic check is for the interpreters which are able to analyse the languages of the program and work for the ru nning of it. SemHive has been for the adaption to the different dynamic type checking procedures and approaches. (Wu, 2015). Exception The process for this is to handle the information along with the execution when the error is there. Hence, there is a need to work on the recognized schemes with the handling of the exceptional handling with the implementation for the dynamic registration process. This cause the code generation with the structural development which contains the information structure to work on the generation of code that has been relevant to the handling of the table driven approaches. The table has been set which is based on the compile time and the link time which contains all the important and the relevant information for the exceptional handlers that has been associated to it. (Wu, 2015). There is a need to work on the execution process where the error occurs and the table is properly consulted and works on the program counter development with the handling of the errors. For the SemHive, the approaches have been set where there have been no particular demands for the merits and the demerits of th e two major approach patterns. Reliability, Writability and the readability This is based on the metrics which are directed to the programming language. This has been set to define the measurements with the concrete development of the tools and the comparison of the two languages. There has been an estimation method for the heuristic and the indirect grading where issues remain to handle the policies and the other priorities process. The factors of the readability refer to the use of the program by properly understanding the programming language. This is mainly to take control of the performance and the linking of the program to write effectively. Reference Hill, C., Dwyer, H. A., Martinez, T., Harlow, D., Franklin, D. (2015, February). Floors and Flexibility: Designing a programming environment for 4th-6th grade classrooms. InProceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(pp. 546-551). ACM. Howland, K., Good, J. (2015). Learning to communicate computationally with Flip: A bi-modal programming language for game creation.Computers Education,80, 224-240. Tan, A. T., Falcou, J., Etiemble, D., Kaiser, H. (2016). Automatic task-based code generation for high performance domain specific embedded language.International Journal of Parallel Programming,44(3), 449-465. Feo, J. T. (Ed.). (2016).A comparative study of parallel programming languages: the Salishan problems. Elsevier. Ball, T., Zorn, B. (2015). Teach foundational language principles.Communications of the ACM,58(5), 30-31. Wu, Q. (2015). Designing a smartphone app to teach English (L2) vocabulary.Computers Education,85, 170-179. Janjic, V., Brown, C., Mackenzie, K., Hammond, K., Danelutto, M., Aldinucci, M., Garcia, J. D. (2016, February). RPL: A Domain-Specific Language for Designing and Implementing Parallel C++ Applications. In2016 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processig (PDP)(pp. 288-295). IEEE.